Bath Road Cutting Renewal

Civil Engineering, Earthworks & Drainage

Brief Description

The existing slope drainage system had insufficient capacity to cope with the surface and subsurface flow from the adjacent land. Frequent spring lines were present at various locations along the cutting in the upper and lower slope. Network Rail required an upgrade to the drainage system to reduce the detrimental impact on the stability of the slope, giving control over waterflow and generally making the area safer.

Description of Works

The site is located approximately 200m north of Ashley in Wiltshire on the Great Western Main Line from London Paddington to Plymouth at 101m1710yds to 102m1000yds on the Down Line and comprises a cutting up to 25 m high, with a slope angle up to 35 degrees.

The scope included: –

  • Full de-vegetation of the site
  • Temporary access road/ramp to access onto mid-slope bench
  • Cut off drain located at the crest of the cutting slope
  • Mid-slope concrete canvas lined ditches
  • Deep hole drains installed on the upper and lower slopes
  • Counterfort drainage system
  • Cascade drainage system
  • Kite Systems permanent access steps
  • Key-Klamp handrailing
  • Catchpit installation at track level

Objectives of the Works

The existing slope drainage system had insufficient capacity to cope with the surface and subsurface flow from the adjacent land. Frequent spring lines were present at various locations along the cutting in the upper and lower slope. Network Rail required an upgrade to the drainage system to reduce the detrimental impact on the stability of the slope, giving control over waterflow and generally making the area safer.

Failure modes included localised slumping, terracing on the mid slope, washouts and persistent cracking observed throughout the cutting slope. The work was preventative rather than reactive to target  improvements in the Earthwork Score and to create more stable and reliable infrastructure.

 

How CML achieved the Key Outcomes

The site was split into 3 No. zones (A, B & C) during the design phase identifying works required within each zone to compile a tailored project plan to factor in individual health and safety requirements.

  • Due to the availability of only a narrow haul road along the crest line within Zone B&C, CML planned the works to be completed in tandem commencing in Zone C working back towards Zone A. Upon commencement of the full de-vegetation works of the site, a 2m deep cut-off drain was installed at the crest of the cutting slope to provide significant control of surface water run-off from the adjacent fields, with the preference for this to run along the length of the cutting boundary and outfall to the existing track drainage via piped connections.
  • The drainage design utilised a lined mid-slope ditch along the length of the cutting, with the ditch positioned along existing benches in the cutting face. This ditch was based on Network Rail standard detail NR/CIV/SD/322, with the ditch lined in concrete canvas. The purpose of this ditch was to convey flows from the installed raking drains and collect the run-off from the cutting face above the ditch. The installation of deep hole drainage installed along the entire 1km length above and below the mid-slope ditch, expelled water to the ditch and the existing track drainage. Additionally, subsurface flow would be controlled via the crest filter drain (detailed above), which would intersect groundwater flow from the large greenfield catchment and reduce the amount of discharge from the slope face and also reduce the risk of future asset failure.
  • Several shallow counterforts were constructed at identified spring points to collect water in a controlled manner. The objective being to divert water from the mid-slope ditch and existing track drainage. This detail was based on the NR standard detail RD2 on NR/CIV/SD/327.
  • Managing Health & Safety and the Quality of Delivery

    The CML site management team fully complied with the CDM regulations and more specifically the duties required of the Principal Contractor. The team held the required competencies, including Personal Track Safety (PTS), Engineering Supervisor (ES), Controller of Site Safety (COSS) Protection Controller (PC) and Handback Engineer, and had a significant level of experience in delivering this type of works particularly in the railway environment. Site specific H&S measures were implemented and included: –

    • The installation of combi steps and ramps to make access to site easier and safer. Where slopes were too steep to install these, IRATA (Industrial Rope Access Trade Association) qualified workers gained access through the use of ropes.
    • Works were carried out during some of the hottest months on record. While this assisted with the drainage, CML needed to ensure the safety of operatives on or about the line. Shift patterns were arranged around the hottest times of the day with the UV index displayed on whiteboard briefings. We ensured all staff had a sufficient water and SPF50 sunscreen (which we supplied) and maintained a general monitoring of their wellbeing during the day, ensuring appropriate breaks were taken.
    • Due to the size and scale of the project, daily H&S briefings were held in addition to comprehensive site inductions. Regular Manager Safety Tours were completed and recorded, and the Office and Rail and Road (ORR) conducted their own independent site visit, leaving satisfied by what they found.
    • Each item of plant machinery had their own docket of information that included safety requirements, inspection results and any historic information e.g. repairs undertaken. These records were kept in one place allowing it to be readily available for staff to review.
    • Our Digital Enterprise System enabled real-time Close Call reporting and information to be relayed from site and the same approach was adopted for quality control measures. INSIGHT (developed by the designer of “OnTrac” innovative rail safety software specifically for CML) collates all works information requirements to support development of specific site Safe Work Packs, identifying all resources needed to support safe working removing any communication barrier between senior managers and site workers. The system includes all Risk Assessments and Method Statements (RAMS) as well as site specific diagrams, identifying hazards to support safe working, all of which are prepared in advance of commencement of work on site. This information is communicated in real time via the CML app to site and senior managers for required actions to be instigated. Site managers use the app to report any issues/examples of good practice back to senior managers so these can be addressed,  collated, and shared across the business.
    • On site communication – our daily whiteboard briefings reminded everyone of the planned tasks and any issues /hazards to be aware of. It allowed the team on site to question what is happening and establish common understanding. As part of our Supervisor Development Programme, we have adapted this process to allow a more fluid way of thinking and to add prompts to what we may need to consider when the brief is being completed. This approach is based around R.H.I.N.O. (Risks, Hazards, Information, New, Observations) as prompts for the site manager and team members to ask questions, challenge practice and consider the safety of the whole team. The R.H.I.N.O. board includes direct reference to Network Rail’s Life Saving Rules.
    • Magnetic Vortek Fencing was installed during night possession to create a demarcation barrier for the workforce during the day. Where fencing installation was not possible, i.e. new drainage catch pit installation, possessions were utilised to complete the work during the night.

    The works were delivered with zero accidents or incidents, with regular site inspections and safety tours undertaken by Directors/Senior Management which promoted positive safety behaviours on site.

    All health and safety measures, audits and findings were recorded on our health and safety system with sign-off from both CML and NR representatives to ensure open communication and an auditable trail.

  • Stakeholder Management - Landowner Negotiations

    A landowner affected by access was hosting his daughter’s wedding on land required to facilitate works access which had the potential to become a contentious issue. Using our effective stakeholder engagement, we built a rapport with the landowner to understand his concerns, present our solutions and evidence that we would be sensitive to his needs while we undertook essential works. The landowner was won over and provided glowing feedback.

     

  • Sustainability & Environment - Badger Setts

    Several active badger setts were present throughout the site, with  The Protection of Badgers Act 1992 preventing works taking place in areas known to be occupied by. This generated programme risk and needed to be addressed in order to achieve completion before the winter set in. Works were re-sequenced to allow the positioning of one-way badger set gates for a minimum of 21 days in accordance with the protection act. Flexibility within the plan allowed us to maintain productivity whilst badger mitigation works were being undertaken.

    Exclusion zones were established around these areas under the supervision of a qualified ecologist, whilst other works were undertaken.

Lessons Learnt and Continual Improvement

Innovation: The use of bespoke Rendezvous Point (RVP) Boards was developed specifically for the use on this site, due to the sheer size and scale of the worksite. This made it easier for any operative or subcontractor working on the site to know exactly which area they are working in should the emergency services be required and for reporting of any accidents or incidents.

The boards were deployed at planned agreed stopping points, a suitable distance from the worksite, to alert operators of the worksite limits. Specific information was displayed relating to the location of the board to enable emergency services to pinpoint the location of an incident. The boards also contained emergency kits (first aid etc), H&S briefings, and phone numbers for line managers and the Network Rail signal box, for emergency communication purposes. This best practice has now been adopted on all Network Rail Western projects.

Contract Management: With circa 40 No. Technical Queries submitted prior to and during the physical works, the CML management team developed a tracking system that could capture technical and commercial elements in real-time. This was shared with the client for clarity periodically to enable both parties to have a common understanding of project progression.

Delivery Challenges and Mitigations

Challenge/Risk: On-site driven design changes

The design was at Approved For Construction (AFC) stage during tender award but upon commencement on site, supplied setting out points had multiple anomalies present which meant that the drainage did not work with the natural fall of land.

Mitigation: CML worked collaboratively with the Network Rail team, utilising our in-house design and engineering resource to redesign/adjust the setting out positions of start/finish points of drain runs/deep hole drains, and mid-slope bench details, to ensure a fully functioning drainage system could be installed. Our swift recognition and approach to this challenge mitigated delay to the programme and ensured follow on works were constructed safely, and on time.

Challenge/Risk: Any Line Open (ALO) Working

The line is the primary route for trains between London and Penzance, with a minimum of 4 No. trains per hour (passenger and freight). To ensure disruption to train services was kept to a minimum, Network Rail required the works to be carried out in accordance with the Any Line Open (ALO) Code of Practice.

Mitigation: CML scheduled work predominantly for days, rather than relying on night-time possessions, removing the associated risks surrounding night-working, worker fatigue and resident disruption. CML’s proposed method of working involved the use of large items of plant working in an ALO environment, working from the existing mid-slope bench. A robust ALO plan was completed for each of the items of plant, which consisted of a combination of our own in-house sourced machines and supply chain plant, and this was integrated into the master programme.

CML selected to use specialist items such as Long Reach Excavators fitted with GKD Series 2 Virtual Wall Slew Limited Devices. The reason for this plant selection was predominately health and safety as the long reach machines allowed for works to take place from a safe position. Due to the volume of traffic still using the lines and the location in which excavators needed to be placed, there was a risk potential of excavator arms swinging into the path of moving trains. The GKD series is more advanced than conventional slew restriction systems and prevented this from happening by detecting where the lines and working parameters were.

This enabled the majority of works to be completed during non-possession working within normal daytime hours creating an efficiency of £275k. 30 No. possessions were negated and the associated cost of RRV’s and personnel reduced.

  • We’ve had positive feedback from the landowner, the wedding has been quite a contentious topic when agreeing the land access over the last year, so thank you for accommodating any requests that Tristan made and hopefully Network Rail will be allowed back through here in the future.

    Jack Cleeves
    Project Manager Capital Delivery Western: Network Rail

  • Tristan (the landowner) sent me a note on Friday evening saying how pleased he was with how you left the site in preparation for his daughter’s wedding- he thought it looked as good as could have been possible given the scheme being present/underway and he wanted me to thank you.

    Andrew Bower
    Consultant Surveyor: Carter Jonas

More Case Studies

Subscribe to our Digital Newsletter

Keep up to date with our latest news, projects and industry developments